Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rollup of 3 pull requests #62093

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Rollup of 3 pull requests #62093

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Jun 24, 2019

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

matthewjasper and others added 7 commits June 22, 2019 15:36
@matthewjasper
Prefer to use has_errors to err_count
30b6c59
@matthewjasper
Count all errors for track_errors
95a3215
@petrochenkov
Remove built-in derive macros Send and Sync
e1d871e
@JohnTitor
Add test for issue-38591
a257dff
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#62055 - matthewjasper:fix-error-counting, r…
3e316ee 
…=pnkfelix

Fix error counting

Count duplicate errors for `track_errors` and other error counting checks.
Add FIXMEs to make it clear that we should be moving away from this kind of logic.

Closes rust-lang#61663
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#62078 - petrochenkov:nosendync2, r=varkor
5015430 
Remove built-in derive macros `Send` and `Sync`

Closes rust-lang#62050
@Centril
Rollup merge of rust-lang#62085 - JohnTitor:add-test-for-issue-38591,…
1fc9ddc 
… r=Centril

Add test for issue-38591

Closes rust-lang#38591

r? @pnkfelix
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Jun 24, 2019

@bors r+ p=3 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 24, 2019

📌 Commit 1fc9ddc has been approved by Centril

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 24, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 24, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 1fc9ddc with merge 30363feb53f971e60dc1b99d8e16da5a14c152ab...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 24, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jun 24, 2019
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job test-various of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log. 
[01:39:49] test time::tests::system_time_elapsed ... ok
[01:39:49] test time::tests::system_time_math ... ok
[01:39:50] test thread::tests::test_park_timeout_unpark_called_other_thread ... ok
[01:39:57] test sync::mpsc::tests::stress_recv_timeout_two_threads ... ok
[01:40:47] test process::tests::uid_to_root_fails ... test process::tests::uid_to_root_fails has been running for over 60 seconds
No output has been received in the last 30m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
Check the details on how to adjust your build configuration on: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received
The build has been terminated

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@Centril Centril closed this Jun 24, 2019
@Centril Centril deleted the rollup-lko9zgp branch June 24, 2019 13:09
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@Centril @bors @rust-highfive @matthewjasper @petrochenkov @JohnTitor